Welcome to Discuss Everything Forums...

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.


 

Your Message

Click here to log in

What is the sum of 36 and 12

 
 

You may choose an icon for your message from this list

Additional Options

  • Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].

Rate Thread

You may rate this thread from 1-star (Terrible) to 5-stars (Excellent) if you wish to do so.

Topic Review (Newest First)

  • 12-16-2011, 07:23 AM
    anthony

    Does the Hazelton decision give Libs a ominous foreboding of their illegal aliens' fate with Arizona review?

    Both Hazleton and Arizona's immigration laws make use of a narrow exception in the federal Immigration Reform and Control Act, which restricts states' ability to fight the employment of illegal immigrants. The federal law prohibits states from imposing penalties on businesses that employ illegal immigrants except through licensing or permitting requirements.

    Under the Arizona law, employers who intentionally employ illegal immigrants and fail to check the immigration status of new hires using a federal online database can have their business licenses revoked. Critics dubbed the sanction the "business death penalty."

    In its 4-3 decision May 26, the Supreme Court ruled Arizona's law "fits within the confines" of the authority the federal immigration law reserves for states.

    "In exercising that authority, Arizona has taken the route least likely to cause tension with federal law," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote.
    http://articles.mcall.com/2011-06-06/news/mc-hazleton-illegal-immigrants-suprem20110606_1_immigration-laws-arizona-law-illegal-immigrants






    The Supreme Court, already poised to decide one hot-button political issue during an election year, may also tackle the Obama administration's challenge to Arizona's law requiring its police to check the immigration status of people who are stopped.

    In addition to opposing the Arizona law, the Obama administration has contested similar immigration enforcement laws adopted by Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina and Utah.

    At issue is not only who can enforce the immigration laws but also what the policy should be for the millions of illegal immigrants living and working in the United States.

    Obama's lawyers would prefer for the Supreme Court to steer clear of the issue.
    If the court votes to hear the case in the spring, it will elevate illegal immigration as a political issue.


    http://news.bostonherald.com/news/national/southwest/view.bg?&articleid=1387461&format=&page=1&listingT ype=natsw#articleFull
    A string of cases all point to a 5-4 Conservative majority laying down the hatchet on obama's beloved illegals and an end to his use of the DOJ to try to stop states enforcing federal law he refuses to enforce.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •