Reply to Thread

She probably should have checked the definition before adopting the mantle of Rogue:
–noun 1. a dishonest, knavish person; scoundrel.
2. a playfully mischievous person; scamp: The youngest boys are little rogues.
3. a tramp or vagabond.
4. a rogue elephant or other animal of similar disposition.
5. Biology. a usually inferior organism, esp. a plant, varying markedly from the normal.

Money and power is all that matters to a politician. Going Rogue is simply a catchy title.

I wouldn't call her a rouge. Rouges are a GOOD thing. We stir up society and expose the lies. Sarah Palin is no rouge. She creates lies and add's more layers to society's falsehood.

The only thing Sarah Palin is going against is the little intelligence she has.

Don't forget, she's also a maverick!

Whatever sells books and wins votes. She's rogue like I'm the starting center for the Lakers.

what else does she have? she is the dumbest politician i have ever seen

Is sarah palin already rogue and isn't being rogue going against the rules of...

...our adult & educated society? If you remember going up you were told not to be a rebel, not to be a trouble maker, not to make your yourself look bad, Not TO BE A ROGUE. Learn ho to get along in society without causing any problems for yourself or anyone else. As an adult you are told not to stir the pot, act like an adult, NOT TO BE A ROGUE. When did being ROGUE or GOING ROGUE become acceptable? Isn't being rogue Going Rogue the last thing we want to encourage?