If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
Post a reply to the thread: If He called it specifically an "act of Terror" why did NOT one paper post that as a headline?
Click here to log in
In what corner do we have Search box?
You may choose an icon for your message from this list
Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].
You may rate this thread from 1-star (Terrible) to 5-stars (Excellent) if you wish to do so.
Because no one knew for sure what the motive of the act of terror was.
If He called it specifically an "act of Terror" why did NOT one paper post that as a headline? Perhaps because he was generalizing and was less than specific. ACT'S of Terror is a plural statement. Act of terror is singular. Describing one event, a normal person would indicate it as "singular".
If He called it specifically an "act of Terror" why did NOT one paper post that as a headline?
Forum Rules