is there a cleaned version out yet?
is there a cleaned version out yet?
It is clean, just remove the checks from the 4 boxes during installation and no adware will be installed.
If you are referring to the built in banners, I have not see a lite version of eDonkey2000 1.0 as of yet.
ok. n is there ne diff between basic or pro or is that simply the banners? n what r ppls opinions concerning it n overnet?Originally posted by Fat@8 August 2004 - 18:53
It is clean, just remove the checks from the 4 boxes during installation and no adware will be installed.
If you are referring to the built in banners, I have not see a lite version of eDonkey2000 1.0 as of yet.
i am an overnet fan but since its telling me i am out of date n i need to up grade to this i am thinking about it
Overnet and eDonkey are murged into one prog eDonkey v1.0. With this version you can connect to both the overnet and edonkey (edonkey is optional in options) networks.
And for the banners in edonkey v1.0 just search for a crack /patch or something like it with edonkey/overnet
is that the only diff between basic n pro? the banners?
Would the previous .dll "adremover" files and such that were commonly found in tmpj's Overnetlite version essentially "unlock the pro version" in eDonkey v1.0 or are new cracks needed?
Mind you that I am just throwing out a question and I know nothing of how the application actually works.
If you're looking for the new eDonkey client with the patch, just search for it on the network, it'll be called eDonkey 2000 v1 and crack.rar or if you're just simply looking for the patch, it's called betamaster edonkey v1.0 unlimited_pro_crack.rar.
It works.
i found it. and am very impressed so far with it.
Just a personal preference, but I'm never comfortable installing adware/spyware and then using a patch to cover it up. At least not when it only takes a little extra effort to find adware/spyware free versions, ie. Lite.
Not intending to start a debate as to which path is better. Just throwing something out to think about.
thats not what the patch is for.Originally posted by guit_steel@10 August 2004 - 08:23
Just a personal preference, but I'm never comfortable installing adware/spyware and then using a patch to cover it up. At least not when it only takes a little extra effort to find adware/spyware free versions, ie. Lite.
Not intending to start a debate as to which path is better. Just throwing something out to think about.
the patch stops a banner showing up in the main program like a website banner
when u install the program u get the option to not install the web adware stuff
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks