Thread: my bloody valentine 3D?

Unfortunately, I sat through this Sunday evening...not in 3D though. The theater where I live was built not even 2 years ago and they don't have the "equipment" to show a 3D movie? I call B-S on that but anyway, the storyline/plot was...sketchy, if best. No real explanation of anything and just completely contrived to give you the biggest "gasp!" at the end...My gasp was more one of "Oh gosh, I sat through this for THIS to be the outcome?" instead of "I totally didn't see that coming!" Now, I do have to admit that Jensen Ackles is absolutely WONDERFUL to look at and I think I may have fallen in love but...that doesn't make up for the boring plot, the HORRIBLE acting by the girl that portrays "Megan" nor the completely irrelevant nudity. I can stand nudity when it actually contributes to the plot but this was just...too much. I was actually starting to feel just...dirty watching it. Maybe in 3D it would have been worth the $8.50 but otherwise, it wasn't even worth a $1 theater showing...

Whats the point of making a horror movie in the dark if you can't even see anything??

I think it is scary. And if you like horror then see it.
The advert shows people who actually were seeing it , they said some people ducked down , and were scared. So if you like the sound of that , see it !

It's a good screamer that makes you jump in your seats. Had to pay $2 extra for the special 3-D glasses though - so keep that in mind. Gross scenes & objects flying toward you that make you flinch. Won't spoil it for you - but I thought the ending could've had a better twist.

i just saw it last night, and personally, i deffinately dont think it was worth ten dollars and an hour an a half. the gore was amazing, but it was just a really stupid story line. well, hope this helped