Recently I've been studying a few issues in the field of gender studies. One particular subject of note was androcentricism (male-centeredness) and how masculine models of morality, such as justice and fairness, have historically shaped conceptions of ethics in preference to more feminine models which focus more on interpersonal relationships and the virtue of care.
However, I find that personal experience seems to contradict these presumed models. This is particularly apparent when it comes to women's views on Michael Vick's inhumane treatment of animals and on Tiger Woods' now infamous cases of infidelity.
Women (it seems) are more likely to wish ill upon people like Vick and Woods: even death. Men are more likely to give these guys a pass. Of course, women are more sensitive to the issues involving animals and infidelity; but this additionally makes me wonder if vengeance is an equal opportunity offender; and the respective potencies of said vengeances are the mere result compartmentalizations respective to gender.
So I ask: is vengeance a more male-oriented vice? Or do women's more emotional nature make them more likely candidates for harboring such feelings?
Intelligent answers appreciated. Random links to a baboon's behind are not.
Bookmarks