While you're technically correct, '2D' and '3D' just take less time to say than 'traditional hand-drawn animation' and 'computer generated imagery'. It's a simplification, but 2D and 3D is just the language people understand.
While you're technically correct, '2D' and '3D' just take less time to say than 'traditional hand-drawn animation' and 'computer generated imagery'. It's a simplification, but 2D and 3D is just the language people understand.
You can't go wrong with traditional 2D's more diverse artwork.
Flash comes in second, and only when it's done right like with Foster's and Pucca.
Well,we need to teach people what they're called instead of assuming they'll never learn;just calling it what noobies start out calling animation and settling for that.
Thing is that Flash is also CG despite almost all of it being 2D, so using "CG/Traditional" to split the difference isn't really a superior choice.
On the forum where everyone abbreviates everything.
Lol. |DD
I notice that you completely ignored my post where I explained to you that 3D CGI is 3D animation. Just like you completely ignored me when I pointed out that there's no real reason why cel animation should be called "traditional" when it was predated by stop motion the last time you brought this stuff up.
Oh, and by the way: Jerry Beck. Amid Amidi. Aardman Animations. Are these people all "noobies" in your eyes?
:bump:
sorry, coul'dnt help myself:sweat: .
Why'd you bump it?
2D, 3D, Flash, I don't care, as long as it's good.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks