After going through the thread concerning unashamed cartoon watching, it got me to thinking about something for a while now. I think the most apparent reason why some who try to convince others and have a hard time getting through to them that most animation isn't just kid stuff but really more so for general audiences, is because of some animated material not being as perfect or up-to-par enough as others or more so than others. Those particular shows and movies may be according to some or most, but then again, is it really a matter of who's right and who's wrong about them? While an animated work may be one's gem, it may also be another's fake nugget. And we all have varying takes on them. So who's to say for sure and how does one really know, if that's the sense? What may hinder some from taking our word for them is the general falsification that all animation is the same in a bad way, that is, dumbed down and patronizing for one (of course, that's not true about each one). Therefore, what do the anti-cartoon nay-sayers know about them generally? Not much apparently and the proof would show them just how much they know if only they'd take the time to try and check out some tip-top stuff, and not be so narrow-minded or cartoon-a-phobic. Because they'll never know unless they actually attempt to find something that grabs out and appeals to them. If they still don't, well then more cartoons for us who know better. This is just a theory that came to me one day afterwards. And if what y'all say is true about the majority of cartoons, then the stickers on the plastic wrap of the DVD cases that mention the title, price, genre, etc., should mention the genre as animation rather than children in most situations. What do y'all say?
Bookmarks