Some writers describe characters by telling you what they are:
i.e. "she was gorgeous, talented, and...."
Other writers describe characters by telling you what they are not:
i.e. "He was not handsome or well-mannered and he lacked...."
***Question: As writers, is it more effective to describe characters by emphasizing their attributes or by emphasizing the attributes they lack? Should you choose one or the other or a little of both?
I say this having recently read a few Henry James novels. James has an affinity for describing characters by emphasizing their physical and psychological shortcomings.
As always, any thoughts and opinions are welcome.
Bookmarks