Where do you rank your political beliefs?

[o REWIIND o]

Why is it that you refuse to deal with such a problem?

You called Dean a liberal when he clearly has a record of govenrment conservatism. Why is that you cannot admit you are wrong?

[Danzinar]

So what? The judges' actions created greater freedom for everybody in Massachusets. They defended against majority tyranny, and frankly, I do not care about the sources of the laws - only the laws themselves.

[گیلک]

Looks like the Liberals are hiding again? We Conservatives are proud to be labeled as such..........I see that over 20 people have accessed this thread but not one has stood up and said he is a Liberal and why.

I guess I should not be surprised..........

[Denni]

Stupid left-right spectrum.

[briff]

Can`t vote. No socialist option. I refuse to choose between three options of right-winged political beliefs...

[ai_fan08]

The 3 mentioned are the major ones in the USA.....That is what we are talking about.........

[John Kimble]

Except Cuba is not communist nor Liberterian in the slightest.

What has happened to the attitude that we can make things better? Vor's retarded response is the attitude that if you don't like it, leave. Instead of moving forward in making society and government better, we have attitudes that are inhernetly too lazy or incompetent to see that the current sitatution is not ideal. therefore, those people stuck in such mindless ideologies should be the ones to leave as they have no intension or motivation to make the country better as a whole.

So you VOR, YOU GO TO CUBA.

[Question G]

And if I don`t agree to your morals, I should be stripped of my democratic ability of self-determination? I don`t see how this is better than any other form of authorian rule.




In other worRAB; "In an ideal society everybody would have to obey your values and morals"... SounRAB like authorian to me...



Ok. Then I must say that I lean towarRAB your definition totalitarianism myself. allthough I believe the state is the property of it`s members (which makes all human life the property of all human life, Ie; shared responisibilty).

[Nicholas A]

No but the people you elect should make the laws, not activist judges who are appointed.........

Otherwise why bother even having a legislature?

[[email protected]]

Sure it is. You impose the morality that it is wrong for A to do something to B that B doesn`t want. Furtheermore it could be argued that there are many things A can do to B that B doesn`t want without it being imoral.



Laws have to be decided somehow. And the rule of 50,1% of the people is better than the alternative (rule of >50% of the people). Because let`s face it, "someone" will rule and "someone" will impose their morality on the others.