That's now how it was in the case of Megan Kanka, who the law was named after.
Irrelevant. No matter how rare they are, predators do exist and they do pose a threat to your children. If there is a predator living in your neighborhood, I'm sure you'd like to know about them. Just answer this, if there's a child predator living in your neighborhood, would you like to know about them so you could warn your children to stay away? Or would you rather leave it up to police, who will not warn your children and cannot react until after a crime has been committed?
I wonder if your views would change if your child was molested by a serial rapist living across the street from you...
No, Bennett. It's you who has the false sense of security. For the fiftieth time, the police aren't meant to protect you. Even if they're monitoring a criminal, an arrest can only be made after a crime has been committed.
Anyhow, that is true. But making them known in their home area is better than leaving parents ignorant.
I can garuntee you that Megan's law does a thousand times more to prevent crimes than police do. It informs you, the guardian, that there's a sex offender living in your neighborhood.
First, the belief of American mob rule is nothing but UK propaganda. It's utter bull####. Here in the US, we have police, a court system, laws, and penalties for people who break those laws, just like in the UK. No more people are victims of vigilantism in the US than in the UK, so get those ideas out of your head.
Once again, police aren't meant to protect you. They're meant to arrest people after a crime is committed.
How often is often? Can you prove that their innocence after they were found guilty in a court of law, which is the only way you can end up on Megan's list?
You're still assuming that police are meant to protect you. They're not.
Look, Jo, from what I've seen most of you UK people are sheep; you believe whatever the government tells you to believe. In this case, the government is telling you that you're safer from sex offenders just becuase the police are prepared to arrest them after they commit another sex crime.
Wouldn't you say it's better to prevent a sex crime than it to arrest a sex offender after it's too late? Knowledge can do this; police monitoring can't.
Bookmarks