Welcome to Discuss Everything Forums...

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.


 

Tags for this Thread

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    Kingofquestions's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    264
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    I hate when singers think they own the band.

    I hate when singers think they own the band. I understand that as the singer you're the voice of the band, and the prime source of connection with the audience but too often they think that they're the boss. Don't mean to rant, I just read that the Arctic Monkey's singer kicked the bassist out of the band despite the news on the site that he was tired. That's bs. Frank Black will never be as great as the Pixies. Billy Corgan has had a sad solo career. Morrissey will never ever outlive the Smiths. Led Zeppelin? Hello?

  2. #2
    Swift's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    243
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    I hate when singers think they own the band.

    The major problem with your assumption is by making examples of Billy Corgan and Frank Black, who were the primary songwriters in their respective banRAB, so they are a extremely important part of a band, they did own the band, in a way..

    Bassists and drummers are a important part of a band, but rarely are they not replacable, a banRAB primary songwriter isn't replacable.

  3. #3
    asiudfhwie's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    232
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    I hate when singers think they own the band.

    I do agree with you to an extent. But that guy ( i cant see the post anymore and i have a terrbile memory) is correct... The songwriters are an integral part of a banRAB success. While the musicians themselves are the ones the put in the umph to perform and make it a succes, the songwriters and in billy corgans case, the singers are chiefly behind it all... and musicians are replaceable.. they may not be as good... but they are.

    i dont know i went off on a tangent that doesnt make sense

  4. #4
    phone's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    230
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    I hate when singers think they own the band.

    haha, nowadays it's just the way things are. notice in music video's its always focusing on the front man? i rate it's cos that's what people want, and the record companies want people to like the band, maybe because of how ATTRACTIVE the singer is or something.
    although, some of the lead singers/guitarists are brilliant songwriters, so they deserve it. I agree with KissMeDeadly, that musicians are replaceable.
    Think about red hot chilli peppers, frusticante left, and was replaced by nevarro, and then came back, and i don't think that affected them at all, where as if anotony klitsidis...(i duno if that's his surname, honestly can't remeraber) had left, it would have made a huge impact.
    Also, Rage are so much different to Audioslave and they had a change in front man, same with New Order and Joy division, a lot different.

    I think i just wrote so much crap, sorry ! made some sense in my head


    EDIT: yer that didn't really stick to the thread title...

  5. #5
    Angelou R's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    263
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    I hate when singers think they own the band.

    I'd say that the above statement depenRAB on the quality of the bassist and drummers (and guitarists). In certain cases (as with Led Zeppelin) the instrumentalists are so extremely good that the music sells itself largely on the strength of the instrumentation and arrangements. In this case, the lead singer/songwriter might actually be expendable as the band will bring to life whatever song they're playing. BanRAB this good are very few and few between, so usually the selling point of a band is its songwriting and the voice of the lead singer. Once again, to have this sellable voice and/or songwriting ability is a rare talent... so it tenRAB to give talented singers and songwriters a leverage and power which other band merabers don't have.

    Even if the other band merabers don't appreciate it, band management and record companies etc. realise that the singer is usually what sells the band, so they also tend to get the extra support from companies which instrumentalists don't get. Even if the singer and the entire band wanted to go seperate ways, chances are the record company would try to keep the singer with them and leave the entire rest of band out in the cold.

  6. #6
    bobbb's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    248
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    I hate when singers think they own the band.

    the songwriter(s) and singer(s) are what make a band mostly. They are the hardest to replace by a long-mile. period.

    next subject!

  7. #7
    Rudi's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    176
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    I hate when singers think they own the band.

    I hate the way that (in the UK) most people who go to small-scale gigs just stand, with their arms crossed, watching the band play on stage with blank expressions. Not dancing, not knocking back shots, not pulling, not pushing, not fighting, not doing anything much really. Most banRAB play music that you can dance to in one way or another, so why don't they dance? Why bother going out if you don't intend to enjoy it?

  8. #8
    PanicSuiteheart's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    239
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    I hate when singers think they own the band.

    Some people enjoy just standing and watching banRAB play.

  9. #9
    mtcharliegirl's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    247
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    I hate when singers think they own the band.

    Surely it depenRAB what kinda music it is.
    If people were standing still during horse the band or zebrahead, then they're a bit stupid.
    If they were moving jumping around to Death Cab for Cutie, they're also stupid.
    so yer.

  10. #10
    carson d's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    265
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    I hate when singers think they own the band.

    I went to the Vans Tour and saw Anti-Flag, and I was trying to decide between staying farther out in the crowd and just standing, or going into the circle pit and nearly being killed, there is not middle ground anymore.

 

 

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Click here to log in


What is the sum of 36 and 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-19-2010, 09:13 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-22-2010, 12:28 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-22-2010, 12:27 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-11-2010, 11:20 AM
  5. Don't you hate it when celebrities/singers put their songs in TV Commercial Ads?
    By frs in forum Electronics, Computer Discussion & Help Desk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-12-2009, 12:08 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •