I need to prove this by using the indirect proof method and avoiding universal generalization.
1. (existential quantifier) (Px) horseshoe Qc/ (x) (Px horseshoe Qc)
Any help is some help.thanks!
Tags for this Thread
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 1 of 1
-
12-03-2010, 04:59 AM #1
Junior Member
Status- Offline
Join Date- Dec 2010
Posts- 1
Downloads- 0
Uploads- 0
Indirect proof method in logic/philosophy?
ReplyThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Help with indirect proof please?
By XNicholex3 in forum Online TestingReplies: 0Last Post: 11-25-2010, 05:32 AM -
Propositional Logic:Use indirect truth tables to determine whether the following
By rochelle_9 in forum The 'Big' DebatesReplies: 0Last Post: 11-05-2010, 03:19 AM -
Propositional Logic:Use indirect truth tables to determine whether the following
By rochelle_9 in forum The 'Big' DebatesReplies: 0Last Post: 11-05-2010, 03:18 AM -
Cash Flow statement preparation Indirect method?
By Loan-Anh in forum Discuss EducationReplies: 0Last Post: 07-03-2010, 06:13 PM -
Cash Flow statement preparation Indirect method?
By Loan-Anh in forum Discuss EducationReplies: 0Last Post: 07-03-2010, 06:13 PM
Bookmarks