what branches are blue?????
and compared to this pic as an example
the flowers look way better and less artifacted.
taking from that review/show posted on the first site..
what branches are blue?????
and compared to this pic as an example
the flowers look way better and less artifacted.
taking from that review/show posted on the first site..
^ to be honest, all those 3 pics above look bad
Why do we critique only Nokia here?? Because this is a Nokia N95 thread, not a SE K800 thread. Simple as taht.
If you want to discuss SE's image flaws, do it somewhere else, because it clearly does not belong in this thread!
Notice how Apoc only compares the images to other Nokias?
It is entirely the sensors fault. In fact if you wanted to accomplish all of the goals you just mentioned, they need to dump the CMOS and use a CCD instead. All modern digicams use CCDs (higher quailty cams use 3, R G & B each get their own). CMOS chips are easier (cheaper) to produce and I believe require less logic around them (cheaper still). There has recently been some major breakthroughs with CMOS stuffs and we might eventually see them overtake CCDs in quality or at least match, but those are a few years from market still. As far as your time between shots goes thats more of the processing power and the I/O busses on the phones main board.
I would love to see a CCD based phone cam at 3.2MP instead of a 5MP CMOS cam, but its a matter of cost, and possibly a few other factors. I am not an expert in the field, but I do have a general understanding of it. Anyone please feel free to contribute and/or correct me if I am mistaken.
if it was a N series they would be more crappier imo,
check the top right corner for pic #1, and the bowl on pic #3.
Seeing as how the retail is not out yet, and probably won't be for another month...
Proto?
=D
I think the hardware is pretty much finalized now its a matter of the firmware tweaks/bug fixes.
i am not trying to be picky,
the both of these pics aren't taken from the same exactly location, like the park above...
as you can see the top pic is further away and the , bottom pic is close to the lens, therefore, the closer one is probably not focused correctly. simple.
Nice try..
You missed the whole point, try to read it over again, and it wasn't me who posted LG pictures first. For comparative purposes.
ok u proved your point lol, but still how many other camera phones compare
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks