Alternate to "Ramen" Noodles

[Gautam]

Omelet wrote:

I have done experiments on myself that confirm my body absorbs roughly
half of the calories from some sorts of fiber. The types in fruit and
grain. I have not tried any experiments on myself with glucomannan.
The number of calories involved is small enough it hardly matters
whether I count them or not, count half of them or not.

[Hey Libs!]

On 1/31/2011 11:11 PM, Omelet wrote:

The texture depends upon the mix and can range from rubbery and chewy to
something like Jell-O. Not being made from animal hooves and hide is a
big plus too. :-)

[mrs ask alot]

On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:18:03 -0600, Omelet
wrote:


Perhaps you'd like me to help you get things off your chest...

[sexilizzie2012]

Omelet wrote:

---= On The Bust =---

Sheldon was riding a bus, minding his own business, when the gorgeous
woman next to him started to breastfeed her baby.
The baby wouldn't take it, so she said: "Come on, eat it all up or ...
I'll have to give it to this nice man here."
Five minutes later, the baby was still not feeding, so she said, "Come
on, honey. Take it or I'll give it to this nice man here."
A few minutes later Sheldon blurted out: "Come on, kid. Make up your
mind! I was supposed to get off four stops ago!"

[a??? Brittney a???]

Omelet wrote:

If you eat foods from the Atkins Induction list or otherwise stay near
20 for your other meals that puts you near 50. It is very easy to eat
near 20. You have a good plan.


Soluble fiber does reduce cholesterol. It's supposed to be from
absorbing dietary cholesterol. I'm dubious that can be true based on
the amounts involved. A simple model is higher fiber eating is good for
you and that helps cholesterol but that too is dubious on mechanisms. ;^)

[a??? Brittney a???]

Omelet wrote:

With sugar alcohols it's comparatively simple. Know the carb count that
kicks me out of ketonuria. Be in ketonuria. Eat to right up near the
limit. Eat the sugar alcohol by gram count. See if it kicks me out of
ketonuria. When I did that experiment it showed that I absorb over 50%
as carb grams so rather than count none I count all.

With fiber my method is much less exact. Have a low fiber meal where I
low the blood sugar response. Another day have the same meal with
different fiber count. Track blood sugar response. Using the colored
strips from the store that are no where near exact because I don't need
a machine. If I had a machine and did hourly readings it would be more
exact. The way I did it was more finger in the wind level of
measurement.

Treating absorbsion of non-carb fiber calories through blood sugar
reaction can't be anything like exact. It's what I could think of. But
how to get an exact count? Even chemical tests on stool can't achieve
that because of calories absorbed by intestinal bacteria.

[Apostate]

Omelet wrote:

Hmmm. Odd thought. I wonder whether one could combine the two?

--
Jean B.

[Sonu Singh]

Omelet wrote:

I love the texture of shirataki--not quite as much as I love bean
thread though.

--
Jean B.