Japan: "No cause for alarm"

[txnhsehntr]

Re: [email protected] cal

J. Clarke wrote:


You're saying they don't know the maximum energy that can be released by a
given fault? Fact is, they do, except in the case of undiscovered faults. If
you think they miscalculated in Japan, provide some evidence.

[***Dark~Angel***]

dsi1 wrote:

suspect,
in
using
father


That's courage!!!

Between both of you!!!

I once got woken up by ambulance drivers. "We need your help." I asked
what? who?" You're father is having a heart attack and we need your help
to get him to the ambulance.

I wide awoke and ran to his bedroom.

I'll never forget him declaring me the man of the house and that I
should take care of Mom. We were apparently saying our last goodbyes. At
10 years-old I asked him, "what's it feel like?" STUDPID QUESTION. He
said it feels like the weight of the world is on my chest.

He survived four more goodbyes.

Andy

[gutz_otoole]

In article ,
[email protected]de says...

So how are you going to reduce the population? The only way to do it
quickly that I know of involved a _lot_ of radiation.


If whatever alternative you prefer is so safe why not put that in the
downtown cities rather than the boondocks?

Has it occurred to you that land in downtown cities is _expensive_
compared to land in the boondocks?


No. Do you work for or on behalf of the alternative energy industry?

[Zaid A]

Re: [email protected] cal

J. Clarke wrote:


You know as well as I that I'm talking about earthquakes and resulting
tsunamis. You never miss a chance to pick a nit, regardless of how far you
have to divert to find one. Geologists can in general predict the maximum
possible energy release by a given fault, they just can't predict exactly
when and where it will occur or to what percentage of max it will let go.
Any other lame nits?

If it becomes apparent that those older methods are not accurate, yes, of
course, especially when you're talking about nuclear energy. Are you really
unable to grasp that concept?

[Sandra L]

On Mar 22, 6:26?am, Andy wrote:

My Dad, we never knew he had lung cancer until the Dr. told us after
he had died. He didn't want to burden us with his illness. We knew
he had some type of illness; we thought it was just weakness brought
on by old age. But I was somewhat suspicious because he had a
prescription for dilaudid.

[JBallaa]

In article , [email protected]
says...

That would certainly be beneficial.

[Treasan]

On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:01:52 +0000 (UTC), Nad R
wrote:


DITTO!

--

Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.

[macdady]

Re: [email protected] cal

J. Clarke wrote:


So now you want me to prove a negative? Seriously? It's already been done at
least once.

Do you think that nuclear engineers and

Then you very obviously either can't read or failed to read because I have
advocated exactly that in this thread. You've now gone full circle in a
ludicrous attempt to argue forever.


Like I just said...


Wooo, that's a dire threat and withering rebuke indeed. You aren't capable
of mocking me, only proving repeatedly your compulsive need for nitpicking
argumentative confrontation. Mock on, mockman.


I wouldn't call it conversing.

[karikalan]

On Mar 22, 7:30?am, Portland wrote:

OOooops. I shouldn't have posted that my Dad took dilaudid. The
stupid cow Omlette will probably call him a wuss for wanting pain
killers. The stupid cow stated that I was a wuss for wanting dope
when they put a tube down into my stomach. She sucks big time. Bull
cock is what she sucks. If she's lucky.

[blackbronco92]

On 3/23/2011 7:08 AM, Ema Nymton wrote:


I've never heard anybody express this sentiment before. OTOH, I have a
step-mom although I don't really consider her a "mom" cause I was
already grown by the time my father got married. Mostly, she's my
father's wife. I am glad that he has a companion since it would be a
difficult gig for me. Anyway, good for you!