In article ,
Dave Smith wrote:
Was it the charity that outed her? I'm not positive.
Regards,
Ranee @ Arabian Knits
"She seeks wool and flax, and works with willing hands." Prov 31:13
http://arabianknits.blogspot.com/
In article ,
Dave Smith wrote:
Was it the charity that outed her? I'm not positive.
Regards,
Ranee @ Arabian Knits
"She seeks wool and flax, and works with willing hands." Prov 31:13
http://arabianknits.blogspot.com/
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:31:04 -0700, Dan Abel wrote:
Why didn't you look yourself, wiseass? There is plenty of reliable
evidence demonstrating that children who harm animals become
desensitized and are very likely to become highly abusive as adults,
many go on to become serial killers. A four year old is far too young
to comprehend that killing a fish is different from killing a sibling.
Children shouldn't be taken fishing until at least 6-7... and even
then shouldn't be permitted to disgorge a hook,or even watch until
8-9. No one who lives within 100 miles of a suppermarket needs to
hunt wild animals except those with small egos and even smaller
peepees... there is no comparison between wild animals and livestock.
There is absolutely no sport in hunting, it's pure murder of a
defenceless living creature.
http://www.spca-kwt.co.za/Downloads/...Holly_Nash.pdf
Boron wrote:
Hear, hear! But is it really occupying front pages?
Bob
On 2011-03-29, Christine Dabney wrote:
IOW, the smarmy witch is more worried about her image than any
inconvenience of having to dice onions with a dying drape-ape. If I
was the kid, I'd tell her to bugger off, cuz I've changed my mind and
now wanna visit an opium den with Charlie Sheen.
nb
On 30/03/2011 9:27 PM, Steve Pope wrote:
PETA. Now there is a credible source. Not that they refer to abuse of
animals not hunting for food.
Not all childreneare so far removed from the reality of their food
source that they do not think of hunting.
On 2011-03-29, Ran?e at Arabian Knits wrote:
Maybe Ima Garpin felt kinda like that old saw, "Who'd wanna be in an
organization that would have me as a member."
nb
Dave Smith wrote:
I advocate banning several of the things you mention, and strictly
regulating the remaining.
I do not accept "gee if you're going to ban X why not ban Y" arguments.
That is not careful analysis of the issues.
Steve
On 29 Mar 2011 13:41:40 GMT, notbob wrote:
Seems you enjoy being called an asshole Bob, calling a 6 year old boy dying
from Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia a dying drape ape is low even for you.
Re: [email protected]
Dave Smith wrote:
I never said or implied that they have any such right.
That probably was bad form on their part. But it's likely her PR people made
the decision and my point remains that turning down Make A Wish with all
it's attendant good publicity isn't good form for a publicist either.
MartyB
Dave Smith wrote:
It's like wanting to meet with a sports star. Plenty of sports stars
are happy to meet fans for the Make a Wish foundation. Some aren't. So
they should take requests like "I want to meet a basketball star" or "I
want to meet a celebrity chef" but not requests for a specific person.
I'd be thrilled at a visit by any celebrity chef.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks