OT - Royal Wedding

[WOO WOO WOO]

"Nancy Young" wrote in
news:[email protected]. com:


Yes, the wedding. I don't watch morning television, and if I were
to, I certainly wouldn't watch US morning television when the local
stuff (excluding the Conservative Televisual Vortex channel) is
more informative, so I assumed you meant the fact that British
royal weddings start broadcasting at 2AM.

Not apologizing :-)

--

The Bible! Because all the works of science cannot equal the
wisdom of cattle-sacrificing primitives who thought every
animal species in the world lived within walking distance of
Noah's house.

[hjkfjkdjf]

Mark Thorson wrote in
news:[email protected]:


Rome had no effective competition, like China on its ass. I give
the US another ten years, tops. And I'm being generous.

--

The Bible! Because all the works of science cannot equal the
wisdom of cattle-sacrificing primitives who thought every
animal species in the world lived within walking distance of
Noah's house.

[wreakmayhem]

Re: [email protected]

jmcquown wrote:


It's good you didn't say magazines. They are inundated, as are the webzines.

I expect to see Popular Mechanics come out with a Royal Wedding
Commemorative Issue.

MartyB

[Mariah (:]

"Nunya Bidnits" wrote
in news:[email protected]:


Not my problem. We were part of a British colony by then and had
soundly rejected offers to join the revolting masses to the south
of us.

--

The Bible! Because all the works of science cannot equal the
wisdom of cattle-sacrificing primitives who thought every
animal species in the world lived within walking distance of
Noah's house.

[Twisted Pixie]

Nunya Bidnits wrote:




If it was a special about the royal wedding, I'd go along, but it's just
your everyday morning shows the people watch anyway, there are
more things than just that. They often have a lot of content I'm not
interested in, that's why I record and fast forward through it, as other
people do.

I do not know what the ratings are for dedicated Will & Kate movies
or shows, and they were put together in anticipation of interest. I
don't know anyone who is that into it, we were just talking about
that at Easter. Lots of coverage, no one into it.

nancy

[fuckawut89]

Michel Boucher wrote:

Rome held it comfortably long. And we're just
getting started.

[Anna Jumped]

"Nancy2" wrote in message


Oh, Nancy, come join me at 4 am for crumpets and tea! I listened to my first
royal wedding -- Elizabeth and Phillip -- in 1948 on the radio in my dorm
room. Bless 'em all (some more than others, of course)!

Felice

[eve l]

Dave Smith wrote in
news[email protected]:


Or India.

--

The Bible! Because all the works of science cannot equal the
wisdom of cattle-sacrificing primitives who thought every
animal species in the world lived within walking distance of
Noah's house.

[Princess95]

On May 1, 7:02?am, sf wrote:

There was a study a couple decades ago, though, that said people who
lived together before marriage had more divorces (percentages) than
those who didn't. One can hope that isn't true with this couple. And
yes, William is said to be crazy about babies, and she is 29 after
all. ;-)

N.

[Aaishaa!]

On 2011-04-26, Dave Smith wrote:


.....and kisses the ass of some old shriveled up hag queen while a 1/4
of the country blows ya' all off by unoffically succeeding to France?
Yeah, you guys are on top of it! LOL....

nb