Did Paul say anything that made you get second thoughts? I thought this debate more than any of the others exposed his weakness when it comes to proper identification and understanding of our enemy and what drives them!

If you didn't see that can you tell us a little about your other political views, like planned parenthood funding? Or death taxes? Or roe v wade? Or borders? How about WW2 should we have just gone after japan and not germany at all? Did you notice any inconsistency in Paul's answers?