Thread: Give it up LIB ER AL s

Lurking guest, let me spell it out for you (now that we're in the Pit):

You are a fucking lunatic.

GTFO.

And seek professional help.

Originally Posted by GIGObuster

"To be hope-y change-y or not to be hope-y change-y, that is the gotcha question."

http://politicalhumor.about.com/b/20...-refudiate.htm

Thank you for this link. That is hilarious.
"Nay, if you read this line, remember not the hand that writ it; nor the hand
that it is writ upon." - smunch69

What do we do now? Find a new place in order to form a more perfect union... Oh yeah, that was tried and now there are no new places to go.

Fuck it. Kill 'em all. Let God sort 'em out.

Originally Posted by Rigamarole

Lurking guest, let me spell it out for you (now that we're in the Pit):

You are a fucking lunatic.

GTFO.

And seek professional help.

Ohhh, shiver...aren't you just the arbiter of Truth, Justice and The American Way?

Well, I think you may be just the one to know what is "... a fucking lunatic..."

Can't you respond to a political question (search, dear heart) BEFORE you relish trashing the questioner?

Answer the substance of my post FIRST - and then trash me, if you must.

Originally Posted by Larry Mudd

Originally Posted by Cinebar

Originally Posted by pravnik

I can't figure out if the style is more E.E. Cummings or William Carlos Williams.

Maybe someone should submit it to:

http://iwl.me

Wow, that site uses an amazing algorithm.

I did submit it, and it comes back as Cory Doctorow.

For comparison, I fed it the abstract of my Master's thesis and it came back as David Foster Wallace.

Dead?


(Too soon? Always will be, sort of. Miss him.)

Originally Posted by lurking guest

Ohhh, shiver...aren't you just the arbiter of Truth, Justice and The American Way?

Well, I think you may be just the one to know what is "... a fucking lunatic..."

Can't you respond to a political question (search, dear heart) BEFORE you relish trashing the questioner?

Answer the substance of my post FIRST - and then trash me, if you must.

Your first post has NO substance.

Once again you fail to understand that you have not submitted a clear topic for discussion.

Think through what you want to say
Write down the main points - start with around 3
Develop a paragraph of supporting arguments for each of those points
Post it so we might have an actual discussion

Can I be the arbiter of the Canadian way?

Originally Posted by lurking guest

Well aren't you just the arbiter of coherency

Yes -- strangely enough, other people are the arbiters of whether or not you are coherent.

Or at least, conventions of usage taught and shared by other people are. Merely insisting that some list of words and partial phrases means something does not make it so. I could just utter random syllables myself and insist that I'd just said the greatest thing ever, and other people would rightly ignore me.

Originally Posted by lurking guest

Answer the substance of my post FIRST - and then trash me, if you must.

Please tell us what substance you're on.