Theory...ridiculous yet thought provoking.
Daniken's idea of ancient aliens is, to an ideal mind.....silly. Yet some ideas he points out in his book charriots of the Gods do deserve some merit as hypothesis. Though he lacks sufficient, tangent and realistic evidence a few of his ideas (and few to the smallest amount) deserve futher investigation of a proffesional nature.
I want to know anyones views on this, sceptic or full blow Danikenites alike, and for examples not of proving that Daniken directly is wrong, but rather the proof (with realistic and sensible evidence) that man has not been alone.