Ain't it ironic same cons who whine'bout a nanny state want drug prohibition

[Karl the Heathen]

and wanna regulate private lives?
Not the best spelling, that I reckon. Blame the characters limit, I had to cram it in.
Nice neighborhood? I used to live downtown Seattle, boy.

[The Taxpayer]

Drug prohibition saves crime and lives - "cons" pay for police protection through taxes and the rehabilitation of all the criminals.

[The Taxpayer]

Drug prohibition saves crime and lives - "cons" pay for police protection through taxes and the rehabilitation of all the criminals.

[mom of 3 and done!]

Where did you get your facts? So not true.

[bert]

Ironic...but not common.

[Patches O'Houlihan]

Funny that you inherently claim the left doesn't want to regulate private lives while you support a healthcare bill that regulates private lives on a scale never before seen in America and clearly unconstitutional. You're funny.

[Thank You]

Drug prohibition is too vague. The only drug that has a legit case to be legalized is weed , the rest is way to dangerous to let it be used in the open.

It would be ironic if a drug user kills you in a car crash.

[Pro Con]

I am a fiscally conservative Republican. I don't care what you do in your bedroom but I do care that the government you've saddled me with wants to make my personal decisions for me.

For example, I prefer to choose my charities and I generally pick one that says thank you once in a while instead of behaving as if I owe it to them.

I mostly side with my libertarian/Libertarian friends, but I'm working from within the Republican Party, like Ron Paul, because it's the only place from which to accomplish something for fiscal conservatives.

[Asquared]

And hypocritical. But what else do you expect from a Neo-conservative?