Welcome to Discuss Everything Forums...

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.


 

Tags for this Thread

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Coriolanus
    Coriolanus's Avatar
    Guest

    Ford burns through first $7.7 billion bailout. Now it wants more. Seriously, what is...

    ...the problem here? "Ford announces $129M 3Q loss, burns $7.7B in cash," http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081107/ap_on_bi_ge/earns_ford ; "Congress weighs loans for automakers," http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSWBT00966320080909

    So I'm wondering, first, what is wrong with these carmakers that they're apparently so a.ss-backward in the industry that they can't even get on their feet with $7.7 bil. I'm wondering, secondly, where the $7.7 bil actually WENT.
    Uh, JMB, I don't have my "mind made up" about anything. I realize what a company this size going under would do to the rest of the economy.

    Please. Since you have such deep knowledge. Enlighten us. Perhaps you could throw in a bit about what an illusion the "free market" is.

  2. #2
    Receiver of Light
    Receiver of Light's Avatar
    Guest
    Let 'em burn as far as I'm concerned...give the money to the people...we'll spend it!!!

  3. #3
    jfinnovations
    jfinnovations's Avatar
    Guest
    The money went to all the Top Dogs in salary and bounuses.
    They need more because their cars suck and nobody buys them.

  4. #4
    artgurrl
    artgurrl's Avatar
    Guest
    The company has cash on hand incase of down turns of the economy or whatever. The cash paid for salaries, insurance, capital etc because no one is buying new autos for them to make a profit. Welcome to the Bush economy and the disaster capitalism that Milton Friedman style of economics has brought us to.

    Ford never modernized their plants making them more efficient and less costly. They also never made cars in the numbers that would be in demand that are ultra fuel efficient, especially during times when gas was approaching $5 a gallon. Dumb move on their CEO's part. GM is in the same position.

  5. #5
    JMB
    JMB's Avatar
    Guest
    I was going to attempt to answer that question, but I am afraid any educated response would not be understood, because it appears to me that you already have your mind made up, and no one is going to change it.

    artgurrl, explained it very well, which saved me a lot of typing.

  6. #6
    Ace
    Ace's Avatar
    Guest
    Into their pockets. They need to keep a better track of what people do with these bailouts.

  7. #7
    Obama is a commie
    Obama is a commie's Avatar
    Guest
    They had to pay all the union thugs.

  8. #8
    Pax
    Pax's Avatar
    Guest
    The govt = crowd of idiots. If I actually didn't want these failure corporations to go under, I would friggin nationalize them and scare the crappy management off.

  9. #9
    dan
    dan's Avatar
    Guest
    FORD is a crap company that makes crap cars - if anyone deserves to fail, they do! They aren't needed, so a bailout for them is ridiculous...

 

 

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Click here to log in


In what corner do we have Search box?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-07-2009, 04:35 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-25-2008, 09:10 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-09-2008, 06:07 PM
  4. $700 billion bailout?
    By slackjaw79 in forum Discuss Current Events
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-23-2008, 06:18 AM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-23-2008, 11:47 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •