Does climate change have to destroy the earth in order for it to be a threat to the US?

**Tenshadesofdeath** · 04-05-2009, 10:44 PM

flood? they do not understand the full implications of no ice caps, night and day wave goodbye, wild weather mars will be more hospitable, thats the upside? first the ground shakes then come the floods followed by lightning all over the earth.

**Seldon Surak** · 04-05-2009, 10:44 PM

yes, it is a very real threat
see "an inconvenient truth"
it won, not just an oscar, but the NOBEL PRIZE
so, how bad could it be?

and your congressman should be put to a biblical death
instead of stones, throw bibles at him til he dies.
just kidding, barely

04-05-2009, 10:45 PM

Remember when these same scientists were going nuts over global cooling in the 1970's? How it would end the world. It seems like they like to create a catastrophe every so often to make themselves feel important. People in 2030 will look back at this global warming thing and laugh at us for buying into it.

04-05-2009, 10:54 PM

Destroy the coastal cities, and you destroy most of our population. The congressman is technically right, flooding wouldn't destroy the planet, just destroy everything the human race has accomplished. The planet would still be here doing it's thing, But it would be a global threat.