dont like emule is so slow
dont like emule is so slow
tiolewis -Interesting. Perhaps you did not use eMule much, then? I get my fastest DL speeds with eMule and not with uTorrent, toughYou can get anything with Emule , but the speed isnt good at allBut many of the older torrents run at like 0,1 - 0,5kBy, so... Let's talk about speed, lol :lol:
its possible to find so many things on emule, as compared to bit torrent, yeah you have to be patient with speeds but in the end its worth it.
theres two ways of looking at this, both systems have their pros and cons. both are free though, and so dont match to newsgroups.
the point is you should have both to complement each other. just saying that something sucks is an awful way to put it
I'm sorry but you are very misinformed about BitTorrent. Almost everything is available on BitTorrent and on the good sites you'll almost every time find a seed or if not somebody will come to reseed. It's a lot of choice and when it comes to quality, quality is a lot better than on eMule. On private sites you find only lossless music with all the tags in the right place so it is with DVDs, HD-DVDs, Blu-Ray discs... For me, in the quality section BT is a winner.
emule rocks . You must not know how to use it... LOL
I used to use eMule a lot but now not so much. I tend to use it for odds and sods like an individial music tracks.
I'll just put it this way I never used eMule and I never will. As ED2K being very slow network thanks to majority of eMule clients with large queue system. That is practically way to much time consuming and waste of time for someone like me who is a super seeder. Anything I download I get it from UseNET or BlackNET time to time from torrent.
I run my own FServ and share over iRN and when bandwidth is not used I upload in ED2K. aMule/eMule both sucks compared to GT based networks.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks