OT: It's Catherine with a C, folks

[northwest_usa]

In article , [email protected] says...

The Crown Estates, confusingly named, do not belong to the Crown (or
Sovereign) but to the State, which manages them and receives the income
from them.


I think you mean the Civil List. The only Civil List payment is to the
Queen and her consort for the expenses of their official duties; William
doesn't get a Civil List income. He's financially supported from his
father's income from the Duchy of Cornwall estates; and inheritance from
Diana.

Janet UK

[ROBBBBB]

On 30/04/2011 7:09 PM, Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:
e oddball info I keep track of is socially useful.

That is my point. If there is only one, there is not ordinal. If they
were the first, then they were, to that point, the only. Queen
Elizabeth I was Queen Elizabeth for roughly 400 years, not Elizabeth I.

[Dineshia]

In article , [email protected] says...

The Duchy Of Cornwall, does in fact extend far beyond Cornwall and
includes land in 23 counties. Map here

http://www.duchyofcornwall.org/aroundtheduchy.htm.

AFAIK The Duke of Cambridge is just a title, there's no duchy land estate
any more.

Janet

[Sivvus]

"spamtrap1888" wrote

That's the way the rules are. William may be king someday, but Kate will
never be queen. She (and Diana) were not royalty and cannot hold the title.
At best, she will be Queen Consort.

[Car K]

Dave Smith wrote:


Until Elizabeth 2's accession there was no formal usage of Queen
Elizabeth 1. Only when there are 2 does a regnal number come in. For
Example, if William had a daughter, he named Victoria and she came to
the throne she would be Victoria II. Not to be confused with Queen
Victoria's Imperial cipher VRI where I stands for Imperial and not 1.

THe Queen mum though also named Elizabeth was no more referred to as
Elisabeth II than her Mother in law was as Mary III. And if Duchess of
Cambridge becomes QUeen consort she wont be Catherine III, through her
husband might be William V iirc.

Charles III i always thought had a nice ring to it.
--
JL

[Teddy :]]

In article , [email protected] says...

It's a dirty job, but somebody's gotta do it.

[Julius E]

In article , [email protected] says...


Nope. Only the son of a Sovereign can hold that title.


Janet

[vid_a_lou]

"Felice" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
I hope she's not going to be a topic for a while. Unless she can cook and
offer recipes.

Jill

[b&b photography]

"ItsJoanNotJoann" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

LOL sucht intensity) I can't say it bothers me much

I will take whatever Joseph says He seems to be the expert here

--
--

https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

[Why you wanna trip on me?]

In article ,
[email protected] says...

She (and Diana) were not royalty and cannot hold the title.

They are Royalty and Kate will acquire the title Queen when William
becomes King. (Diana would havem had she satyed married to Charles)


Queen Consorts are still called "Queen".. like Queen Elizabeth, the Queen
Mother.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_mother

Royalty is defined as members of the Royal family who are close blood
relatives of the Sovereign (or married to one); both the blood rellies and
their spouses are titled Royal Highness.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British...ist_of_members

As Royalty Kate is now addressed as Your Royal Highness (same as P
Philip, and Diana before the divorce). Her full title is

Her Royal Highness Princess William Arthur Philip Louis, Duchess of
Cambridge, Countess of Strathearn, Baroness Carrickfergus

Like P Philip and Diana, and the Queen Mother, Kate will never be in
the line of succession to the throne.


Janet.UK