Thread: Black man defends home, self, son from lynch mob and gets PRISON for it

Huh? Maybe I was unclear in what I said.

If a gang of unarmed thugs was attacking me I would shoot them BEFORE they got the chance to jump me. Is that more clear?

Read the communist menifesto and the 10 steps to communism then look at your statement and tell me what's wrong. I have faith.

And don't worry about the violent mob in the front yard. I see.

Who's not defending the shooter?


Why would that matter?

Making them leave his property = pursuing them for vengeance?

I agree with you. If they said "Come out here or we are going to come in here and kill you!" that would be another thing.

But they didn't say that now did they?

No, they were just trespassing and using "nasty words".

Understand the difference yet?

Go look up the the thread where a guy shot and killed a robber in a neighbors house. He even called 911 and couldn't wait to shoot the guy even when the operator told him to hold back.

He was treated as a hero on OT.


I've been here longer than you pal and I have participated in everyone of these threads, and this is the first time where the majority of OT thinks a homeowner didn't have the right to kill an intruder. This is also the first time that it was a black homeowner.

Yeah, pretty unclear, because there is no way you would shoot me --that's what you said--if you were unarmed.

anyway, that's completely different than kids yelling from the street.

(talk about dying in a crossfire!)

ok........... so here:you think it's ok to shoot someone because he "might be dangerous"


but then there's this:



even though one is supposedly someone protecting himself and the other deals with "American criminal justice" they still don't jive with me.....all the kids outside HAVE DONE is yell. but you're ok with justifying their shooting because the "can be dangerous"?