Emule or Torrents

[Beezy]

The BT speed depends on its seeders, just like eMule's, BTW. "BT is better in terms of speed" is nonsense.

Totally right, although a lot of users here use private trackers, where there are much more seeders than leechers, which makes popular downloads blazingly fast. Some concerns such as the BT "credit crunch" come with that, though, but nothing's perfect. Private sites have tried to make up for it with bonus points and even ratio-free schemes.

[Rohit.fire]

torrents, obviously!

[ωєєzу вαву..♥]

me torrent

[Julio Batista]

on emule slow download

[hevans1944]

Which would you say is better? What are some of the pros and cons of the two? I've never used emule, so I'm curious.

[burbonas]

In a nutshell, eMule's retention for old stuff is fantastic, but the wait times and speeds are exasperating. With torrents it's the exact opposite.

Emule or Torrents

Definitely, torrents for new stuff.

[Nintendo-Miranda]

of course
old emule
new torrent

[Doctor Monmon]

I used to have an account at fileheaven and now its gone due to inactivity. fml

[tabluvr2001]

speed talks here-
i take ths side of torrents- requires more care but worth it

the big thing that works for torrents is its private trackers option which gives it the clear edge

[tucsonsunapt]

LOL making a broad statement with little information to back it up. I will go against what your saying and say you are completely wrong. Been using emule for years and will probably keep using it for many years more. Tell me what torrent site has even close to the vast archive of files that emule has. Join a good emule indexing forum and even the speeds are decent. Torrents have their own purpose and so does Emule.

Any good emule forum, that's open, that you could recommend?