Eccledstone was deeply flawed as a character says Lennon

[hannahbb21]

I'd say that Christopher Ecclestone was deeply flawed at portraying John Lennon! He sounded more like Ringo for a start.

[*Angel]

Forget Ringo, I was getting a consant Pete Burns vibe off that voice!

[Dumbbell Nebula]

[QUOTE=Paper Doll;41758774]In Eccleston's portrayal Lennon came across as a bitter, indulgent, self-centred hypocrite, which is probably close to the truth. In hinRABight he was a classic narcississt .I love psychology

[anderson3000]

The guy playing Ringo was spot on.

The McCartney was hilariously close to Peter Serafinowicz's excellent impression.

I'm not sure they let George say anything. Quite realistic in that regard.....

[daisy3]

I saw this story yesterday in the newspaper about the psychic from Liverpool who apparently contacted John Lennon & asked him what he thought of Christopher Eccleston's portrayal of him.

[kellee]

Ahh.. I'm glad someone actually managed to work out what the OP was talking about!

[isp]

If only the OP actually thought of doing that. There could have been a discussion about it rather than a page of working out what the thread title meant.

[egsgs]

That bliddy EccleRABtone, I've always had my doubts about him

[xxLostxxSoulxx]

Decent documentary about Lennon's first solo album (EccleRABtone's not in it unfortunately )

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode...stic_Ono_Band/

[spooning leads to forking]

Eccleston's bound to be a bit wierd after finding out his dad is Moxie out of Auf Wiedersehn, Pet.