Band dilema.

[Innocent Demon]

don't get high

get poon

[rockergirlz45]

yes focourse, we wrote 2 new ones last night, actually last night was the best practice we've had so far, i was really happy with it. we got our first gig on the 10th of march and i think where i was worried now i'm quite looking forward, my singers being a little more laid back and my guitarist is calming down the the random covers. so all is well but i still want all your opinions.

[midnitewhispers23]

Does your music really consist of such polar opposites?

I mean look at Red Krayola. Every new cd they try to change what type of music they play. They're all about transcending from one genre to another, never wasting time repeating a genre that was successful.

[Charleen R]

what works for my band is that the fact that we are all such good frienRAB so that when i say we are going to be a blatant rip off of radiohead they damn well listen to me.

[fauxfiala]

It's not just transcending by album, he wants to be more along the lines of a **** about band than anything, for a start before me and the singer joined they were covering ratm...badly, nobody should do rage bar rage...and poor tenacious d covers, the only time that can be considered funny is when tenacious d are playing it. And labeling yourself a band that incorperate monster magnet, turbo negro and then covering iced earth, lynyrd skynyrd inbetween...i dunno, i just don't see it working very well, i'd consider any band i saw do something like that a joke band, or completely clueless.

[cfoster001]

I read that Bark Psychosis started as a Napalm Death cover band. Grindcore to post rock, wow.

[Babey♥]

that would not work well.

I'm not a huge fan of cover banRAB, because I believe that the best version is usually the original version. I agree, I couldn't see covering all those different artists working well at all.

Do y'all have original pieces?