How was it? 1-10
1 - being bad 10 being good.
How was it? 1-10
1 - being bad 10 being good.
going to see it in two hours
i give at a 9
i thought it was pretty damn good
atleast as good as heat and collateral
Story/Character: 5/10
For an action movie it was technically extremely accurate, but the lack of a real urgency and the fact that the characters were horrible really hurt the moive.
Look/Style: 7/10
Mann is getting extremely good with the new digital cameras and it shows in this film. I don't think anyone in hollywood can direct a realistic action sequence the way he can, and the way he uses the mobility of the new digital cameras to enhance those scenes is fantastic. However, the movie doesn't really have much to do with Miami and it passed up a lot of fantastic opportunities. So it was gritty and looked good, but really didn't take any advantage of the locations.
it wasn't nearly as good as either of those films.
I disagree with that statement. I do, however, agree with the movie hardly having anything to do with miami.
it pretty much sucked, was pretty boring toward the end, and had way too many characters which made the movie confusing
you cared about all the characters in both Heat and Collateral. They don't make you give a shit about anyone in Miami Vice
heat would be a 9.5
collateral would be an 8.5
miami vice is about a 7.5
its enjoyable, just not as good as the other two.
A buddy of mine saw it and said it sucked ass. He said the commercials hype it up alot to make it seem action packed
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks