Welcome to Discuss Everything Forums...

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.


 

Tags for this Thread

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24
  1. #11
    Meghan D's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    238
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Well this sounds spooky...

    Durab as frack.

  2. #12
    katienie20's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    262
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Well this sounds spooky...

    horrible idea:
    - on a small scale this screws the cardholders - pretty everyone but the bottom 5 to 10%. charities will not benefit from this.
    - on a large scale this screws the 99.9% much much more than the 0.1%. massive money missing and getting recuperated out of thin air = even MORE INFLATION - b/c that's really going to help the 99.9% whose working lives revolve around working for a salary/wage. top 0.1% won't be affected much b/c they already have other means of resources, power, and survival when the dollar tanks.

    helping people in concept = good, poor execution = worse than doing nothing.

    "road to hell is paved with good intentions" or something like that? or "when not thought out, you end up hurting the ones you're trying to help."

    now if we didn't have fiat currency and something like this happened... well... that could have some very big repercussions. good and bad.

  3. #13
    azirontoticon's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    260
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Well this sounds spooky...

    My favorite line was, "its time the banks finally remeraber who they work for".

  4. #14
    TypicalQueerness's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    226
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Well this sounds spooky...

    don't even fracking joke about that

  5. #15
    VampBlood16's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    270
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Well this sounds spooky...

    I don't agree with these hackers..... but you asked>>>

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evOzYj5YzDE

    The FeRAB are the worlRAB worst loan sharks!

    "I sincerely believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. The issuing powers should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs."
    Thomas Jefferson

  6. #16
    physics help's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    255
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Well this sounds spooky...

    That's not stealing.

  7. #17
    Lourdes Q's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    249
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Well this sounds spooky...

    Aren't stealing and fraud basically the same thing? If you profit from the fraud?

  8. #18
    Defy's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    243
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Well this sounds spooky...

    I guess. But its not fraud either.

  9. #19
    Sydnie's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    283
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Well this sounds spooky...

    dear anonymous: leave shit that affects me alone.

  10. #20
    anonymis's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    219
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Well this sounds spooky...

    I suppose it's technically not stealing but when the banks have power over the fed to keep keep 7.7trillion in loans a secret from the treasury, congress, and public? Makes you wonder... it's more than concerning; and how come none of the "fiscally responsible" boasting presidential candidates want to touch this one? It kills me. I certainly think it could be interpreted as fraud, how can you defend this? I'd like to see an investigation but most likely never will.

    I like how Stewart breaks it down here:

    http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/th...ext-tarp-model

 

 

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Click here to log in


What color is our footer?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •