Welcome to Discuss Everything Forums...

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.


 

Tags for this Thread

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24
  1. #11
    Daniel T's Avatar
    Junior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    23
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    He should fire the guy. That said, the President was a "community organizer", a/k/a rabble rouser for leftist causes, in the 1980s. Disrupting meetings with organized (and often paid) protesters it a time honored tactic by these groups. Obama believes that the angry taxpayers at congress' town hall meetings with constituents is part of a similar organized resistance, and he wants to pave the way for having them thrown out or arrested, or at least intimidated into silence.

    But it's a misunderstanding on his part. Once it becomes clear that the taxpayer rebellion is truly grassroots and needs no 'community organizers', the White House will go back to the drawing board and come up with a new health care plan and a new strategy.

  2. #12
    Joe's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,586
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Barry has it right
    Big Al too!

  3. #13
    Joe's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,586
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Barry has it right
    Big Al too!

  4. #14
    Joe's Avatar
    Senior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,586
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Barry has it right
    Big Al too!

  5. #15
    mayna_smo_mry's Avatar
    Junior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    25
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    He doesn;t want civilized anything. he makes all the trouble and blames it on the right. I saw one of their examples butting in and causing trouble to the peaceful protesters.
    and johnson's speech if you can call it a speech was so typ[ical of the how the democrats behave. this is what they call speeches. full of filth and lies.

  6. #16
    U.S.Veteran's Avatar
    Junior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    13
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Why is it that if a black man attends one of the Republican's "Tea Parties" he's made to feel out of place, and possibly lynched, if he's in the wrong part of town, and this is OK to them, but any rebel rouser can shout all sorts of lies and dirty words at town hall meetings, flailing their arms all about and rudely pointing their greedy Republican fingers in everyone's faces but you are a horrible person if you complain about their gun-toting tactics?

    .

  7. #17
    It's perfectly acceptable under this administration to shout down opponents, disrupt meetings and force their issues upon everyone, yet woe betide anyone that voices their opinion against them.

    Reeks of hypocrisy at its worst and according to Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals' it's OK for them but not the other.

  8. #18
    Home-School's Avatar
    Junior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    12
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    All you have to do is change the definitions of a few words and the liberal lemmings will believe evil is good and good is evil.

    In reality, Green jobs means less jobs and people working at something that will ruin the economy and place more people out of work. by destroying the private sector which creates constructive jobs.

    However, if you call those jobs "green" the lemmings believe they are saving the world. Now if you are a liberal lemming chanting "Hope" "Change" "yes we can" well, of course those who oppose a "green jobs" Czar are aholes who want to destroy the world. See how easy it was?

    Now as to changing the meanings of "civilized debate" since lemmings truly believe the ravings of the left, "civilized debate" means - Conservatives allowing liberals to have their way and not making any points that could be contrary to liberal doctrine. In the same way as Bipartisan means agreeing with liberals. and never liberals agreeing with conservatives. Remember, even though Obama calls for bipartisan cooperation, he has never crossed the isle.

  9. #19
    Mr NiceGuy^2's Avatar
    Junior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    9
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Oh my, someone used one of the naughty words?!?!

    To quote the infamous poet and politician, Dick Cheney

    "So?"

  10. #20
    yutsnark's Avatar
    Junior Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    21
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    It's not just Obama. We all want civilized debate, don't we? Do you think that, because his "czar" used a cussword, Obama should now call for an uncivilized debate? What sense would that make?

 

 

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Click here to log in


What is the number after 87?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-15-2009, 07:56 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-24-2008, 10:40 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-22-2008, 09:28 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-16-2008, 12:26 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-15-2008, 07:13 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •