Do you use Azureus/Vuze?

[wateripple]

People who say that Vuze is too resource intensive are wrong. Other than at startup, CPU usage is about the same. Memory usage is higher, but this shouldn't be a problem if you have a gig or more installed.

[rinny17]

Nein.

[theresanangelatmytable]

i use occasionaly azureus 2.5.0.4 , imo the best version of vuze/azureus

Just for the record, if you use 2.5.0.4 because you think it's the last version without Vuze code, you're wrong - that was 2.5.0.0.

[Steelers champions!]

Other than at startup, CPU usage is about the same. Memory usage is higher, but this shouldn't be a problem if you have a gig or more installed.

Agreed. Resource usage was never an issue for me back when I used Vuze. It took longer to start up than uTorrent, of course, but afterwards I didn't even notice it was running.

[rickle91]

I use when I'm way too lazy for setup the moblock

[phone expert]

*Gets in time machine and travels to 2007* "Yes." *Travels back to 2010* No, I nixed Azureus for utorrent when I finally got tired of memory leakage.

[whoaaitsbecky]

I use it since I left utorrent 1.6.1 and don't have plans to switch back so soon.

[Chadwick]

I loved Azureus before to became Vuze. It was excellent torrent client with a lot of configuration options, very stable and user friendly.
Now Vuze is the opposite - useless and pointless file sharing software!

Did you try the classic UI? :unsure:

[likkle Philosopher! xD]

deluge to foundation

[BasicBoy]

bump