Are you for a Constitutional Amendment banning burning the flag?

[Momma Dodson]

Let me guess....You don't have a problem with dipping a crucifix in a bottle of urine and calling it art either.........

[Yes... wait a minute...no]

Evidently you have not read the text of the speech given by a fella named Patton to his 3rd Army on the eve of D-Day in 1944. BTW, are you from Louisiana by any chance?

[Judy b]

It is a form of political expression. Banning it amounts to nothing short of censorship.

[Spaceheart]

Am I for a whimiscal ammendement that violates the first ammendemnet by restricting freedom of expression?

No. Last time I checked we don't ban things merely because we base it on irrational fears, but then again...

[Agnes Pingkan L]

Just answer as to why you would have eartlier made this statement when I ask if you had been into battle............

[Smerfcia]

He can deny it but his posts tell the truth........He is for revolution and overthrow of this democracy.........



I think you make it perfectly clear my friend............When I watch the left wingers burn the flag at their "hate the U.S. protests" it infuriates me.If I was there I would definitely let them feel the size of my size 12 boot on their butt.........

[Prada Brat]

Cool - nothing like constitutional sanction with which to quash dissidents.

After all, if desecrating the flag is traitorous activity, you can round up all the traitors and execute them.

It should be easy enough. After all, traitors are like terrorists.

[abhinav d]

Even Senator Diane Feinstein one of the biggest liberals in the senate said she has found no evidence that the Patriot Act has harmed any American.....You can whine about it all day but the undenialable fact is we have not had a terroirst attack on this country in almost 4 years.....That is not just luck...... 

VoR I can't let you take her comments out of context:

She said that the comments were very old and made before new allegations came out, ones that looked more credible, and they are still viewing them.

Also VoR... let us look at the terrorists attacks on american soil: WTC 92, millennium bombings (failed) 99, WTC 01. This suggests that they can wait years between attacks, choosing instead to wait to the right time. It says nothing about how Bush has done. Indeed the only president to successfully stave off a known attack was Clinton. But will you give him credit for it? I doubt it.


Now, you said that my definition was a good one for being an American Patriot, and standing up for the ideals of the Constitution. Well... is an ideal of the constitution freedom of speech?

[§§Mad Banke®§§]

That still does not make me a socialist. I support free markets, and I oppose totalitarian subversives like you.

[luke666808g]

We don't need an amendment....just some judges that don't believe in a consitution. That way they can use the good ol' "evolving standarRAB of deceny" to decide this issue