Why do some cartoons seem to send the message that it's bad to be smart?
The Smurfs might be the best example. Besides maybe Jokey, who is the most annoying character? Brainy, of course. And when he starts to bore our little collective, what do they do with him? They throw him up and the air and make him land on his head, obviously trying to damage his brain and the source of their discomfort.
Many cartoons also used to feature lovable, kinda dim, losers that often had a smarter friend that saved their bacon, like in Inspector Gadget. But after Ren and Stimpy there were several cartoons where it seemed like the smarter characters were always put upon and the dumb ones, like Dee Dee, Cow, Heffer, Dog from Catdog, Spongebob and Patrick were always rewarded for their stupidity and were usually portrayed to be right while the relatively smarter characters such as Dexter, Squidward, Rocko and Cat are wrong and suffer.
The dumb characters often torment the smarter characters, but innocently, only through their innate stupidity. Despite their seeming simplicity, the dumber characters also often show a savant like ability to do anything needed in a much better manner than the smarter character if it serves a joke, like Spongebob's art being better than Squidward's.
Any more examples? Why is this? Is it an example of the romantic ideal of "primitivism" where the less sophisticated, noble savages are somehow superior because they are closer to an uncorrupted state and thus closer to nature/God?
Bookmarks