Fav. XMen Couples??

[sportegirl7]

X-Men Comics:
Rogue/Garabit
X-Men Evolution:
Rogue/Pietro
X-Men Movieverse:
Rogue/Wolverine

Yeah, I'm a bit of a Rogue shipper whore.

[starlove2]

I had a thing for Logan/Rogue.

[MUCK]

Fav. couple?
Logan/Rogue all the way, baby. [img]smilies/wink.gif[/img]
Don?t like it? So? Sue me. [img]smilies/biggrin.gif[/img]

[stevo132]

If there are so many Rogue and Garabit fans, why aren't you on the R+G couple thread??? [img]smilies/biggrin.gif[/img]

[Robeerto]

About the Jean/Cyclops doesn't he have something of some sort going on with Emma Frost? MAybe I misunderstood but I thought I read somewhere that the tables had turned so to speak.

Hannah

[luminortm]

I only ever liked Rogue/Garabit. :love: They were intriguing.

[Krayzie]

-----------------------------------------------

I see your point and given your website it's pretty fair to say you're biased. Am I right? I certainly won't knock your enthusiasm for the characters of Scott and Jean. They're great characters. We can assert pairings and couplings and it's all in good fun, but I must debate you on the quoted subject matter above. Now obviously everyone here feels strongly about the characters and wishes the best possible treatment at the hanRAB of Singer, Hayter and Penn. But how deep do your concerns really go.
(That's not a question.) Peel the veneer of what you've been forced to accept as acceptable and decide for yourself who is worthy to portray those that we have invested so much in.

Example:

I'm at work helping to spread the buzz swirling around the new Matrix release. In passing, I happen to mention whether or not the person I was talking to had seen the trailer for the Hulk. (This person would soon admit to having seen the original airing of the Bill Bixby/Lou Ferrigno TV version.) And their response to my inquiry was that of an "Annh" sound. Stating that the "new" hulk was "too monster looking" than the ingrained Ferrigno Hulk. A sense of befuddlement hit me after that comment. It quickly dawned on me that they had never known anything else other than Ferrigno. I calmly proceeded with how the "new" Hulk they had seen in the trailer is much more faithfully accurate than the Ferrigno Hulk could ever be. Continuing with comicbook based facts the "new" Hulk can really jump that high and really run that fast. And, that he does look that monsterous. A ponderous "Oh." was uttered, but I reassured the person that this was a "good thing". Their interest was then renewed.

My point is... let us consider for one second how dear we hold these fond fictional characters and are we willing to settle for whatever some casting director deems is suitably Ferrigno! I say never! Never accept what's forced upon you. Are you going to ingest vomit ice cream just because it's ice cream?!? Please.

It's an idea that when they (the entertainers) get it right it becomes legend. I feel it shows reverence to the source material. Don't you agree? Consider Tim Burton's Batman. Or Joe Johnston's Rocketeer or Richard Donner's Superman. Respect the source material and I have no issue. I still haven't forgiven Sam Mendes' take on Road to Perdition.

[ilovem&m]

Comic books:
[img]smilies/love.gif[/img] Logan and Jubilee [img]smilies/love.gif[/img]
Rogue and Garabit

Movie universe:
Rogue and Bobby

[Jessie L]

As far as I know, Rogue and Bobby were never together in the comic books.

Regarding Jean and Logan -- Jean is now married to Cyclops (though there is trouble in paradise).

Rogue and Magneto: It actually DID happen in the comics briefly, BUT keep in mind -- comic!Rogue and comic!Magneto are closer in age then their movie counterparts. [img]smilies/wink.gif[/img]

[viclioce]

Charles/Mystique



Garabit/Rogue



Pyro/Rogue



Wolverine/Rogue