Out of the two, I would get the Saab. The accord has way too much mileage.
Tags for this Thread
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
10-03-2009, 11:08 PM #1
Junior Member
Status- Offline
Join Date- Jul 2009
Posts- 19
Downloads- 0
Uploads- 0
-
10-03-2009, 11:08 PM #2
Senior Member
Status- Offline
Join Date- May 2009
Posts- 1,416
Downloads- 0
Uploads- 0
Honda is a good reliable brand. Go with the Honda
-
10-03-2009, 11:08 PM #3Abe
GuestWhich Is More Reliable? 2004 Saab 9-3 or 2004 Honda Accord?
I know that both the 9-3 and Accord had a lot more issues during the 2003 model year because of model redesigns. I'm hoping that by 2004 the Accord's transmission problems and the 9-3's soft wear problems were worked out. This is what I'm looking at:
2004 Honda Accord LX 4-Door, 4-Cyl, 5-spd, 131k miles for $6495
2004 Saab 9-3 Linear 4-Cyl, 5-spd, 97k miles for $6999.
I need a reliable, long lasting car thats good in snow and is also safe. So which would be better?
-
10-03-2009, 11:09 PM #4
Member
Status- Offline
Join Date- Jul 2009
Posts- 68
Downloads- 0
Uploads- 0
The Honda Accord is a more reliable car than the SAAB. Parts are also easier to get if you have any problem at all. Also consider a Toyota Camry or Corolla. Hope this will help you out.
-
10-03-2009, 11:09 PM #5
Member
Status- Offline
Join Date- Jul 2009
Posts- 42
Downloads- 0
Uploads- 0
The Honda is better. Saabs are European cars and European cars have a reputation for being far more expensive to maintain.
-
10-03-2009, 11:09 PM #6
Member
Status- Offline
Join Date- Jul 2009
Posts- 42
Downloads- 0
Uploads- 0
The Honda is better. Saabs are European cars and European cars have a reputation for being far more expensive to maintain.
-
10-03-2009, 11:10 PM #7
Member
Status- Offline
Join Date- Jul 2009
Posts- 42
Downloads- 0
Uploads- 0
The Honda is better. Saabs are European cars and European cars have a reputation for being far more expensive to maintain.
-
10-03-2009, 11:10 PM #8
Senior Member
Status- Offline
Join Date- May 2009
Posts- 785
Downloads- 0
Uploads- 0
The Honda Accord. Also, the 4cylinder accord did not really have transmission problems. It was the v6 version that had most the problems.
-
10-03-2009, 11:11 PM #9
Senior Member
Status- Offline
Join Date- May 2009
Posts- 785
Downloads- 0
Uploads- 0
The Honda Accord. Also, the 4cylinder accord did not really have transmission problems. It was the v6 version that had most the problems.
ReplyThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Can you fit a 2004 Honda Accord 3.0 Vtec transmission into a 1998 Honda Accord
By Ricky in forum HondaReplies: 0Last Post: 03-08-2011, 04:11 AM -
Saab 93 2004, or Honda Civic 1997?
By ChocoFruit in forum HondaReplies: 0Last Post: 03-06-2011, 04:08 AM -
2003/2004 Honda Accord or 2003/2004 Toyota Corolla?
By the mexican in forum HondaReplies: 0Last Post: 12-22-2010, 04:52 AM -
2004 Honda Accord (diesel, European spec) and 2004 ACCURA TSX (US specs)?
By AZ on a HD in forum HondaReplies: 0Last Post: 12-16-2010, 04:24 AM -
2004 volvo S60 2.5T vs 2004 Honda Accord EX v-6 which is a better deal? (both are...
By tomcat45 in forum HondaReplies: 0Last Post: 05-25-2008, 08:32 PM
Bookmarks