http://www.av1611.org/jmelton/Evolution.html?

**Jack's Wasted Life** · 04-30-2009, 02:44 PM

"Scientists have proven nothing of the kind. They want the universe to be billions of years old because this allows plenty of time for working in Darwin's theory of evolution. There are many scientists who do not believe the earth to be over several thousand years old, and there is much evidence to support this theory."

lolwut

"Comparative anatomy shows that animals and humans have a common Designer. Evol- utionists like to limit their comparisons to bone structures, but why stop there? Clouds are 100% water, jelly fish are 98% water, and watermelons are 97% water. Does this prove they all evolved from a common ancestor?"

LOL

"Vestigial organs do not exist. The so- called "vestigial organs" are believed by evolutionists to be parts of the human body that are no longer needed. These body parts are presumed to be "left- overs" from our ancestors, the monkeys. The organs include the appendix, the coccyx (tail bone), the pineal gland, the plica semilunaris, the tonsils, and the ear lobes."

leftovers from our ancestors...the monkeys
ancestors...the monkeys
>monkeys<

facepalm.jpg

**Jack's Wasted Life** · 04-30-2009, 02:44 PM

"Scientists have proven nothing of the kind. They want the universe to be billions of years old because this allows plenty of time for working in Darwin's theory of evolution. There are many scientists who do not believe the earth to be over several thousand years old, and there is much evidence to support this theory."

lolwut

"Comparative anatomy shows that animals and humans have a common Designer. Evol- utionists like to limit their comparisons to bone structures, but why stop there? Clouds are 100% water, jelly fish are 98% water, and watermelons are 97% water. Does this prove they all evolved from a common ancestor?"

LOL

"Vestigial organs do not exist. The so- called "vestigial organs" are believed by evolutionists to be parts of the human body that are no longer needed. These body parts are presumed to be "left- overs" from our ancestors, the monkeys. The organs include the appendix, the coccyx (tail bone), the pineal gland, the plica semilunaris, the tonsils, and the ear lobes."

leftovers from our ancestors...the monkeys
ancestors...the monkeys
>monkeys<

facepalm.jpg

04-30-2009, 02:45 PM

FABLES AND FACTS ABOUT CREATION AND EVOLUTION

Textbooks and encyclopedias throughout the world promote Charles Darwin's theory of evolution as a scientific fact, yet this theory has never been proven. In fact, as the years roll by, more and more evidence is being gathered in favor of special creation. Friend, have you fallen for one of the biggest fables of our time, the notion that men have evolved over millions of years from lower life forms? If so, please keep reading and learn a few facts that your professor probably didn't mention.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FABLE: The creation-evolution issue is an issue between religion and science.

FACT: Evolutionists want you to believe that their view is scientific and that creation isn't. Evolution has never been proven by experi- mentation and observation, so it is not a scientific view. Evolution is just as religious as Creation because both views require faith on the part of their adherents. No one saw God create the universe, and no one saw the "big bang" occur. Both views are religious as far as origins are concerned.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FABLE: Much scientific evidence has been brought forth in recent years in support of evolution.

FACT: Every piece of evidence produced by evolutionists amounts to conjecture, not prov- able facts. In reality, the true evidence supports creation, not evolution.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FABLE: God used evolution to fill the earth with its numerous life forms.

FACT: The God of the Bible gave specific details of His creation, and these details contradict evolutionary theory over and over again. God's word says that God created the earth and all that is therein in six literal days. Life forms were ordained to reproduce after their own kinds, and no new life was created after the sixth day (Gen. 1-2). This wholly contradicts the evolution theory which has life continuously evolving with new species being produced by natural processes.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FABLE: Many remains of prehistoric animals have been found which prove the Bible's young earth record to be inaccurate.

FACT: The word "prehistoric" didn't exist before the evolutionists invented it to mislead millions of people. All animal remains ever found on earth are the remains of animals which lived from the time of their creation in Genesis 1 until now. None are "prehistoric," and no scientist can prove otherwise.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FABLE: Scientists have proven the universe to be billions of years old.

FACT: Scientists have proven nothing of the kind. They want the universe to be billions of years old because this allows plenty of time for working in Darwin's theory of evolution. There are many scientists who do not believe the earth to be over several thousand years old, and there is much evidence to support this theory.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FABLE: The geologic column shows a gradual evolution from simple life forms to complex life forms over millions of years.

FACT: The "geologic column" exists only in the minds of evolutionists and in the books they write. This column is nothing more than a fictional chart filled with impressive little pictures and big words. The chart is only a theory because it has never been proven scientifically.

The simplest life forms are placed at the bottom of the chart because they represent fossils which have been found in the deepest strata. This much is true, but then the fables begin. The deepest strata is presumed to be the oldest strata (never proven), and the various layers of strata represent hundreds of millions of years (never proven).

The fact is that the Genesis flood could have easily created every rock formation known to man, and the simplest life forms would naturally be found in the deepest strata because more intelligent life forms would have managed to survive the flood longer, thus being buried last. Most of the "geologic column" was created in about one year (Gen. 6-8), not billions of years.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FABLE: Radioactive dating methods have proven the earth to be billions of years old.

FACT: Radioactive dating has proven to be unreliable time and time again. Some rocks in Russia have been radioactively dated at 100 million to 10 billion years, yet it is well known that these rocks were formed by volcanos less that 200 years ago. Live mollusk shells have been dated up to 2,300 years old. Basalt from Mt. Etna, Sicily was mis-dated by nearly 250,000 years. Part of a baby frozen mammoth was dated

**â™£Ã„lmighty Ã„theistâ™£** · 04-30-2009, 02:46 PM

All the "Facts" are completely misleading, and completely false, and there is no evidence for creation, and almost all other evidence points to changes in life. FAIL!

**Gorgeoustxwoman ~P3D~** · 04-30-2009, 02:46 PM

LMAO!!!

Creationism is so hard up it has to rely on lies to survive.

Willful ignorance is not worthy of respect.

"Debating Creationists on the topic of Evolution is rather like trying to play chess with a pigeon; it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory." - Scott D. Weitzenhoffer

04-30-2009, 02:47 PM

no thanks ...

04-30-2009, 02:47 PM

FAIL! All evidence points towards evolution and none towards creation.

Scientist

04-30-2009, 02:47 PM

I agree, good post

04-30-2009, 02:48 PM

To all of you that are saying that these facts are wrong or misleading, then prove it by using websites other than those written by evolutionists. Show me where the missing link is that should be showing up since it takes millions of years to "evolve". Surely there should be some signs of it. There should be fossils that prove the missing link exists. So then, where are they?

Maybe we just have not found the 2 square miles that the missing link lived in? Is that what you want us to believe? Sorry.

As to the author of this post, I like your points. Keep up the fantastic work.