...against Senator Clinton? The only major news organzation that is covering this story is Fox News. Everyone else is sitting on their hands. The only place you may find the story is on the deep back pages, buried in the blogs. My God, where is the moral outrage? Where is the sense of fairness and propriety? If anyone with a status similar to Rhodes had said something that vile and offensive about Obama, all the mainstream media would have the story on page one. But it looks like it's okay to remain silent if the attacks are directed against Senator Clinton or other strong, independent women such as Geraldine Farraro. This is shameful if it is not picked up by the mainstream press. A media coverup to end all media coverups.
Here is a video of Rhodes' vile and explicit-laced rant.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfdhWi5MILo
Sorry, I think you're wrong. If this sort of vile attack had been targeted against Barack Obama, it would be major frontpage news. With this silence the evidence of media bias against Senator Clinton is irrefutable.
Frank, this goes beyond disagreeing with a candidate over positions. It is a vicious ad hominem attack, using the f-word, and calling both Clinton and Ferraro very derogatory names. It is atrocious, filthy, and hateful behavior, and so far the mainstream media are looking the other way.
Yeah but Imus made the front page news, and what he said was FAR milder than what Rhodes said about Clinton and Farraro. Obvious media bias at play here don't you think?
Bookmarks